Jump to content
adamg67

Talk me out of a Barefaced Big Baby 2

Recommended Posts

My to do post-it for tomorrow includes "Ring Barefaced", because I've just about talked myself into needing a Big Baby 2 to replace my Markbass Traveler 151p.

There are a few reasons for this (apart from just GAS). My head is a Markbass Multiamp, so amp models and cab sims, and for gigs or recording I use the DI from that, so the presets I use all have the cab sim turned on. That means that for practicing, jamming etc with just the amp I basically have a cab sim and then a bass cab. I've got the treble on the cab up full to help neutralise that a bit but I've realised a bit late that something more FRFR might be better. Also, when I'm at home I sometimes use the amp head via DI for messing about and recording (mostly I just use the Markbass plugin) and sometimes I'll just play the thing, and again it's not the same sound - and that's usually when I play with the presets and set the thing up.

I'd also like to be able to jam on guitar, I can run my iRig into the Multiamp with it just set up as a power amp and it actually sounds pretty good with the 1x15, but again it's 100% modelling so a bass amp isn't going to give the best sound.

Seems to me that for a completely model based setup, but with an emphasis on the bass sounding excellent, I'm going to have a hard time beating a Big Baby 2.

Edited by adamg67

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As you have the amplifier side of things sorted already, the BB2 as the solution you require is going to be pretty hard to beat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, jrixn1 said:

The other one I'd consider is a Fearless F112.  More expensive and a longer build time; but it can be used as a wedge, and has a lot of customization options.
http://trickyaudio.com/wp/gallery/#page-content

Yeah the Fearless F112 is a great option and from my research of folk who have had both, the Fearless has edged it sonically, with an additional mid driver & speaker, plus having the very useful wedge feature John mentioned. 

https://www.talkbass.com/threads/comparing-f112-bb2.1245612/

The BB2 wins on build time and also weight. 

I thought the BB2 was the more expensive of the two, but let me double check. [EDIT: they're actually pretty comparable on price - the more expensive silver cloth BB2 is £20 more expensive than the most expensive spec'd F112].

Both great brands.

The other cabs that get a lot of love, for good reason, with similar or greater power handling to the BB2 are the Vanderkley 210s. 

As a former Markbass cab owner who now has a BF SC, you're not going to be disappointed if you get a BB2. 

Edited by Al Krow
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, adamg67 said:

My to do post-it for tomorrow includes "Ring Barefaced", because I've just about talked myself into needing a Big Baby 2 to replace my Markbass Traveler 151p.

There are a few reasons for this (apart from just GAS). My head is a Markbass Multiamp, so amp models and cab sims, and for gigs or recording I use the DI from that, so the presets I use all have the cab sim turned on. That means that for practicing, jamming etc with just the amp I basically have a cab sim and then a bass cab. I've got the treble on the cab up full to help neutralise that a bit but I've realised a bit late that something more FRFR might be better. Also, when I'm at home I sometimes use the amp head via DI for messing about and recording (mostly I just use the Markbass plugin) and sometimes I'll just play the thing, and again it's not the same sound - and that's usually when I play with the presets and set the thing up.

I'd also like to be able to jam on guitar, I can run my iRig into the Multiamp with it just set up as a power amp and it actually sounds pretty good with the 1x15, but again it's 100% modelling so a bass amp isn't going to give the best sound.

Seems to me that for a completely model based setup, but with an emphasis on the bass sounding excellent, I'm going to have a hard time beating a Big Baby 2.

 

Ive played through all the barefaced kit extensively (i know a guy who makes them) and the BB2 is my favourite by a long shot. I get to compareit to ampeg, eden and GK cabs occasionally and it always blows then out the water. except maybe the eden which weighs more than my car.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@adamg67 before committing to the purchase of a BF BB2 ponder on the flexibility two BF Super Compacts may offer. I know it's more expensive but having a modular solution may offer some benefits. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, adamg67 said:

@jrixn1 and @Al Krow, I will definitely check out the fearless F112.

@JohnDaBass I'm not sure if the Super Compact is full range? I thought it was more specifically a bass speaker but I'll check.

The SC caps out at 4kHz.  Which tends to limits top end 'zing' if you're looking to slap. As a bass cab it's a lovely piece of kit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Al Krow said:

The SC caps out at 4kHz.  Which tends to limits top end 'zing' if you're looking to slap. As a bass cab it's a lovely piece of kit.

Yeah, so not ideal as a guitar modelling rig - not my main thing but the BB2 would do it no probs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, adamg67 said:

I've just about talked myself into needing a Big Baby 2 to replace my Markbass Traveler 151p.

That's like replacing a Ford Focus Estate with a Mercedes Benz GLS SUV.

Go for it you'll be amazed at the step up in sound quality.

And that's not taking anything away from Markbass or Fords.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A quick extra question, does anyone know how much better the Big Baby 2 is vs the older Big Baby T? There's a T for sale at the moment and it's collectable distance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the website, Alex does a comparison between the old Midget and the Super Midget and there is some info on the differences between the BB2 and the SM, but you would probably get a fuller answer that question via an email to BF.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Al Krow said:

I thought the BB2 was the more expensive of the two, but let me double check. [EDIT: they're actually pretty comparable on price - the more expensive silver cloth BB2 is £20 more expensive than the most expensive spec'd F112].

Looking here: http://trickyaudio.com/wp/enclosures/#page-content the Fearless F112 is £900 base price (which is probably what I'd get).

Looking here: https://barefacedaudio.com/products/big-baby the BB2 is £779.

So the F112 is maybe (based on one comparison on TB) slightly better and I like the wedge angle (bad pun intended).

BB2 is slightly lighter, cheaper and has the try for a month and send it back if you don't like it thing. Quicker build, but that's not a huge factor.

Damn, now I'm further away from a decision instead of nearer!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, JohnDaBass said:

@adamg67 before committing to the purchase of a BF BB2 ponder on the flexibility two BF Super Compacts may offer. I know it's more expensive but having a modular solution may offer some benefits. 

And now I've been through the Barefaced site, I can see that the Super Midget is probably what you mean, and it's a chunk lighter than a BB2... that might actually be the front runner now, as it's a smidge cheaper as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, adamg67 said:

And now I've been through the Barefaced site, I can see that the Super Midget is probably what you mean, and it's a chunk lighter than a BB2... that might actually be the front runner now, as it's a smidge cheaper as well.

I have a BB2 and a Super Midget.  Both are excellent cabs.  The BB2 has a naturally deeper low end and is my favourite between the two cabs.   The Super Midget can take EQ easily though if you want to add more low end and it seems to be as loud as a BB2 if that matters to you.

I often gig with the Super Midget alone.  It's amazingly capable for such a lightweight and small cab.  You can't really go wrong.

Frank.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably worth mentioning that I'm expecting jams, rehearsals and maybe a few small gigs in the near future, and not needing anything beyond that until the back end of next year (and when it gets to that I'm likely to go through the PA and just use the cab as a monitor) - that's what's leaning me towards a super midget now I know it has the high end to do everything I need. If I get to needing something more I can add another midget or compact as suggested by @JohnDaBass

Edited by adamg67

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I played through 2 SC's and they were a great sound but I was after a little more top end so I replaced one with an SM and now I'm happy as.

I use both cabs on quiet/small gigs because, even at low volume, I just like the sound of them together.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...