Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Playing bass as if you were an 80s sequencer (?!)


tedmanzie

Recommended Posts

I was casually playing along to Aleem - Release Yourself last night, and I found myself really getting into the details of trying to play exactly like an 80s sequencer -  trying to get 'machine like' timing, exact note length, dynamics etc. No fills, no little extra bits chucked in! I really enjoyed playing like that, especially the lack of fills and 'decoration'. I can't say I sounded much like a sequencer tbh but nevermind.  I think it might be the future for me. I Am A Robot🤖

Anyone else enjoy like playing like this?!  Sorry if this a daft question.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a sequencer, but Nigel Harrison puts in a lovely little fill at 3:26.

If that were me I would probably overdo it and spoil the the song.

Just goes to show that to many fills or little bits chucked in can be a bit too much.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest subaudio

I think it's very useful to study playing like this. As someone who played through the eighties its something I worked on a lot. 

Start slow, always to a click/metronome/drum machine, focus on consistency, timing and tone and the timing of gaps, also record yourself and study what you recorded to find good and bad things you do. 

I strongly believe that learning to play with feel and groove must begin with a mastery of time, playing precisely and consistently on, in front and behind the beat, so working on sequencer style playing will also develop your groove, once you master on the beat and move onto behind/in front. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crikey 😬

For anyone that wants to luxuriate in the finer details of the bassline and drums without Mr Astley, then here is the actual mastertape, just  drum and bass tracks - nice!:

 

Edited by tedmanzie
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, subaudio said:

I think it's very useful to study playing like this. As someone who played through the eighties its something I worked on a lot. 

Start slow, always to a click/metronome/drum machine, focus on consistency, timing and tone and the timing of gaps, also record yourself and study what you recorded to find good and bad things you do. 

I strongly believe that learning to play with feel and groove must begin with a mastery of time, playing precisely and consistently on, in front and behind the beat, so working on sequencer style playing will also develop your groove, once you master on the beat and move onto behind/in front. 

^^

Totally agree with this..

I can remember going through a similar phase in the 80s too..

In fact, drummers had the same challenge - if not more so - when drum machines became such a dominant factor  in writing, producing and performing music during the same era. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, what a great question. 😎

 

So, when I went to learn this kind of stuff, I found that it takes a different mindset and approach to it. The bass isn't going to be the only thing quantized to the track. The drums/percussion and even other bits within the track will be quantized. Essentially, the tracks are divided.  (for the techie geeks, engineers and nerds amongst us - I wonder if how we refer to subdivisions of bars in sheet music perfectly correlates to binary, hexidecimal etc? 1-2-4-8-16-32 being the denominator to a note subdivision?). 

 

In your mind, how do you think a digitally expressed music motif would be played? Under the constraints of the technology of the time, I'd think of these;

- Dynamics. They usually stay relatively the same throughout.

- Do they drag, push or play dead on in the pocket? Dead on. 

- If you can read music, look at the sheet as if it's a grid divided into 16th notes (32nds if you're playing the likes of Michael Jackson's 'Speed Demon' 🤣). Whilst it's also a great groove exercise, it's also helpful to see where the bass synchronises with the other instruments on the track. If a track is all digitally composed, they will be exactly on. I can't imagine the tolerance (or 'humanising' as Logic Pro would tell you) to be very much, if at all, in terms of 'pocket'.

- On the topic of eliminating 'humanising' in your basslines, I'd recommend some exercises that'll not only help your playing in this realm but they will make your playing so much cleaner in general. If you set your metronome to below 15bpm, leave it running and see if you can hit your notes as accurately as possible to that click. Don't be tempted to embellish or go astray from it. The signs of agitation and frustration are symptomatic of significant improvement. Notice how different your playing is afterwards and be prepared to grin like Cheshire Cat, my low end friend. I call this 'Anti-microflamming'. 

- If the bass line goes below a standard low 'E', can your 5 string handle it without going 'floppy'? Your ye olde Casios and Yamaha DX-7s never have/had this issue. 

- A bass mute (I know, Motown, right?) is surprisingly helpful. Pop some foam under the strings and right by the bridge for an experiment. Play along with the tracks you so wish to and see if it helps your playing.

 

I do hope this helps and feel free to ask any questions. If not, my apologies for over indulging here. :)

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, let's consider the bassline on Go West's  'We Close Our Eyes'  (1985).  It sounds just like a very well written sequenced bassline now, but at the time it seemed to tear up the bass rulebook in terms of phrasing.

Around 1986, Richard Drummie was a guest musician as part of a bass and drums workshop in Brighton which I attended, and he explained that the bass line for this was originally the vocal line from another song he had written with Peter Cox - " we fiddled around with it and it seemed to work"   - God, if only I was that clever!  But maybe it does help explain why it sounded so fresh.

Here's two bass players covering this - contrast and compare - 

Mattivenn goes for a very staccato approach, but Doc 40 Khz is very slightly more legato.  ( By the way, doesn't that Yamaha sound the biz ?)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah... We Close Our Eyes. Played that song at the time- fantastic line. Only minor issue was that I was singing it too- brain explosion!

Anyone who was playing at that time really had to come to terms with the accuracy of machine timing quickly or get left behind. It was a drummer’s nightmare though and some of the old guard I knew couldn’t cope.

Don't make the assumption  that the timings involved were always strict eights, sixteens etc. As soon as drum machines evolved past the TR 808, micro timings and groove templates became available and on all the main sequencers too. Guys at the high end of the production chain were definitely using these tools to refine things to give a less machine like feel but of course still with complete acuaracy and repeatability.

The second bass guy (with the Yammy) nailed it better for me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest subaudio

Love this thread!

Mmmm note values :)

My favourite extension of the sequenced idea is the bass line to Still Too Young To Remember by It Bites, pretty much anything by Richard Nolan really, he, to me, took the synth sequence idea and did awesome stuff with it.

Edited by subaudio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/04/2019 at 21:09, musicbassman said:

OK, let's consider the bassline on Go West's  'We Close Our Eyes'  (1985).  It sounds just like a very well written sequenced bassline now, but at the time it seemed to tear up the bass rulebook in terms of phrasing.

Around 1986, Richard Drummie was a guest musician as part of a bass and drums workshop in Brighton which I attended, and he explained that the bass line for this was originally the vocal line from another song he had written with Peter Cox - " we fiddled around with it and it seemed to work"   - God, if only I was that clever!  But maybe it does help explain why it sounded so fresh.

Here's two bass players covering this - contrast and compare - 

Mattivenn goes for a very staccato approach, but Doc 40 Khz is very slightly more legato.  ( By the way, doesn't that Yamaha sound the biz ?)

 

Yamaha version is tasty! (both v good)

 

Edited by tedmanzie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...