Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Relic-ing: is it still a thing?


skankdelvar

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, Stub Mandrel said:

To relic or not to relic. 

Mystery Holes.JPG

In my opinion there is no need to ask the question, what you have is genuine battle damage complete with functional field repairs.

If you can't live with the looks it is just the sort of thing that hapless hipsters fork out a lot of beer tokens for.  Unless you let a restorer talk you down to a price that allows them to make a profit later on post-restoration that is.

As a hack it looks quite respectable.  All this assumes a playable instrument that sounds at least half-decent of course.

Edited by SpondonBassed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, hiram.k.hackenbacker said:

This for me is the worst kind of relicing. Thomann had two of these until fairly recently, but now have only one, which leads me to conclude that someone has actually bought the other one. The remaining one (below) is priced at just under £13,000 and that is much reduced from what they were originally. I assume this price drop resulted in the sale. I love me a Fodera, but that's just criminal.

 

Screenshot 2019-03-05 at 22.19.34.png

Talk about taking the wee wee.  This instrument appears to have been defaced!

Let's not try and convince ourselves that it has got that way through years of honest to goodness use as a gigging instrument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The volume of response to this thread suggests that relic-ing is still very much a thing for generating opinions about whether relic-ing is a good thing.

It is a matter of conjecture whether the actual practice of relic-ing is still a thing.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SpondonBassed said:

Talk about taking the wee wee.  This instrument appears to have been defaced!

Let's not try and convince ourselves that it has got that way through years of honest to goodness use as a gigging instrument.

@SpondonBassed

That is actually a replica of Victor Wooten's regular bass that was aged over the years the old fashioned way.

 

So yes, it is a reproduction of genuine wear.

 

Here's the vid:

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Stub Mandrel said:

Some might say what's the point paying £££ for a '63 bass if it looks like a 2019 bass?

A good point.

My own feeling is that I would like to use the instrument enough to build up my own patina.

Like with the worn look jeans, it only looks good if the wear is genuine.  Stone wash is only an approximation of the wear that an old pair of jeans gets through being broken in by one individual.  The wear patterns are unique for that individual.  Most people don't see that sort of detail.  That or they choose not to.  Then again, it may be that they just don't care... and really... why would they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, musicbassman said:

....... Ahem ................

 

image.thumb.png.20f14c869eeee5556cae280d6bb36442.png

Being into aircooled VWs I am well acquainted with patina/rat-look (lovely car you posted btw - narrowed, slammed, chopped and patina'ed). Most people do it to preserve the patina of a car that's baked in the sun over the years. You don't see many new cars like that though :)

Edit: For the record, I don't get upset about reliced guitars. I just wouldn't have one in the house unless I've caused it myself, through natural usage - and that's unlikely because I look after my gear. I probably wouldn't even buy one that someone else has played into that state. Unless of course it's a strat that Jimi Hendrix himself torched :D

Edited by Norris
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Cuzzie said:

But there is the crux of the matter - we all impart a ‘soul’ onto our machines because we love our basses,

You are dead right.  This is the nub of it.  You can NOT buy soul unless you are the devil incarnate.

 

 

Heeheehee

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Cuzzie said:

I always wondered about the writing/pronunciation could be relickeyd

It's been said before.  "Reliced" as a word puts me in mind of something that has had fresh lice added.  Like pubes...

The proper word of course is "abused".

Edited by SpondonBassed
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, skankdelvar said:

The volume of response to this thread suggests that relic-ing is still very much a thing for generating opinions about whether relic-ing is a good thing.

Yes.  But what about the tone of the response?  Do I detect a soupçon of honk in there?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, SpondonBassed said:

It's been said before.  "Reliced" as a word puts me in mind of something that has had fresh lice added.  Like pubes...

The proper word of course is "abused".

Or knackered.

Or phuqed. 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, hiram.k.hackenbacker said:

it doesn't change the fact that for me it's a fabulous looking bass defaced,

Victor is a mucky little pup though.  He admitted to never cleaning his basses.

Edited by SpondonBassed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SpondonBassed said:

In my opinion there is no need to ask the question, what you have is genuine battle damage complete with functional field repairs.

If you can't live with the looks it is just the sort of thing that hapless hipsters fork out a lot of beer tokens for.  Unless you let a restorer talk you down to a price that allows them to make a profit later on post-restoration that is.

As a hack it looks quite respectable.  All this assumes a playable instrument that sounds at least half-decent of course.

Afraid I fitted a new scratchplate 🙂 There was no eBay back in the early 90s 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, SpondonBassed said:

This translates as "I did a functional field repair".  If it passes the bass guitar equivalent of an MOT it's cool.  No need to be afraid.  I like the control plate too. 

Sorry - I mean I did the repair in the 90s but fitted a new (whole) scratchplate recently because I want it to look nice >ducks<

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bought I lovely Les Paul Custom a few years back from a guy that clearly had Rory Gallagher levels of acidity in his sweat. It has aged in a completely natural but entirely unattractive way. I've discussed refinishing at least the top with a couple of luthiers but they feel that that would have an adverse effect on the value.  Personally, I feel faintly ridiculous playing an instrument that looks like it has been deliberately aged - even though this is a truly battered, heavily gigged guitar.

 

My VW though is what might be described as an heavy relic. To the point that you can poke holes in it with  your finger.  As soon as I have enough money it's going to look like it's just rolled off the production line.... Then again, it'll aways have plates clearly stating its true age.

 

For the guitars it just seems like wearing someone else's medals to me. As ever, something other than music itself is being used as a marketing tool...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...