Telebass Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Spare bass has been set u like this as we're going to be doing some Pretenders stuff. Anyone else tuned this way? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinnDave Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 I had my Thunderbird strung with extra heavy strings and tuned DGCF for a project where I needed the low D on a regular basis. Band didn't last and the bass is back to standard tuning now. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigwan Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 My old hard rock/metal originals band played in that tuning. Set of Elite 0.110 Steels and minimal setup adjustment from standard (think I had 0.100s on before that). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Telebass Posted November 20, 2017 Author Share Posted November 20, 2017 Yes, the setup was easy, little adjustment needed. Using standard Chromes, after TI Jazz Flats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicko Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 I play No One Knows in this tuning, the correct tuning is way too floppy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Womble Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 The majority of my band's stuff is CGCF...although newer songs we are yet to release are even lower, BF#BE....after several years I have finally had my Cirrus set up to handle the low tunings, and heavier strings of course. The difference is incredible, probably should have done it years ago rather than just putting up with flobby strings, ha ha. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_5 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Me. I have a bass set up permanently in this tuning. I’m using Dunlop Flats (.45 .65 .85 .105) and the tension’s just right. ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigwan Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 14 hours ago, Womble said: The majority of my band's stuff is CGCF...although newer songs we are yet to release are even lower, BF#BE....after several years I have finally had my Cirrus set up to handle the low tunings, and heavier strings of course. The difference is incredible, probably should have done it years ago rather than just putting up with flobby strings, ha ha. Have you ever considered going to CGCG? I've recently got my hands on a 4 string Dingwall AB1 and have a set of heavy gauge Newtone strings ready to go on there for GCGC tuning (REALLY heavy gauge) - in preparation to release my inner Devin Townsend! Have my Ibanez baritone electric tuned GCGCGC already... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Womble Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Yeh the guitarists are in CGCGCG!! I don't know why but I like having that F there... GCGC though?! NICE! There has been tinkering recently with a song in A#...argh!! What gague are you using for the GCGC tuning out of interest? LOVE Devin Townsend - would love to hear once you have managed to release your inner DT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hatori Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Both of my Precisions tuned DGCF with 45-105's. Im running bi amped and loving the low end.☺ 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hatori Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 (edited) I have a hipshot d tuner on one which gives me CGCF if required. Edited November 21, 2017 by hatori 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Steve Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 my old band de-tuned by a whole tone for everything, at the singer's request. Mine was a five string string was down to an A-D-G-C-F I didn't love it - the strings lose a little of their "snap" but it wasn't a huge issue, and I just stuck with my standard strings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigwan Posted November 22, 2017 Share Posted November 22, 2017 14 hours ago, Monkey Steve said: I just stuck with my standard strings. Which is why the strings lost their snap... If you're used to a certain tension why would you expect the strings to perform the same at lower tension? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
borntohang Posted November 22, 2017 Share Posted November 22, 2017 I'm not a massive drop-tuning fan on bass, although I don't mind it on guitar. At the start of this project the singer decided to tune to Eb standard, but between the increased low end on the guitar and the tonal changes to the bass I was having trouble cutting through. Now I tune G#C#F#B a fourth up just to be awkward; definitely cuts through! I've got a spare bass in Eb for recording and found 115s solved most of the tension issues if not the sound. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kodiakblair Posted November 23, 2017 Share Posted November 23, 2017 I've an old Peavey Patriot with a dodgy neck. @alyctes suggested DGCF instead of BEAD for less tension,but no floppiness, and it worked a treat Must admit I do like the way it sounds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Steve Posted November 23, 2017 Share Posted November 23, 2017 On 22/11/2017 at 08:00, Bigwan said: Which is why the strings lost their snap... If you're used to a certain tension why would you expect the strings to perform the same at lower tension? you seem to have missed the "but it wasn't a huge issue" part of my post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kev Posted November 23, 2017 Share Posted November 23, 2017 I am due to be auditioning for a Celtic Metal band next month who play in Drop C and DGCF, a first for me. Found my usual 45-105 lacking in tension unsurprisingly, taking delivery of a heavier set today but historically string thickness has always been more important that tension for me, so I may well stick with the 105's. We shall see! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigwan Posted November 23, 2017 Share Posted November 23, 2017 3 minutes ago, Monkey Steve said: you seem to have missed the "but it wasn't a huge issue" part of my post Didn't miss it, but if it was an issue at all wouldn't you have addressed it? Would have "done my napper in" as they say round here! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Steve Posted November 23, 2017 Share Posted November 23, 2017 42 minutes ago, Bigwan said: Didn't miss it, but if it was an issue at all wouldn't you have addressed it? Would have "done my napper in" as they say round here! nah, more that it wasn't an issue big enough to be worth bothering with. It made absolutely no difference to the sound of the bass, and only a very minor change to the feel of the strings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigwan Posted November 23, 2017 Share Posted November 23, 2017 22 minutes ago, Monkey Steve said: nah, more that it wasn't an issue big enough to be worth bothering with. It made absolutely no difference to the sound of the bass, and only a very minor change to the feel of the strings. Ah I see, not so big an issue then! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.gif.9ad672bb8b84505709f76b39c8c256ec.gif)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.