Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Yamaha BB series - talk me through them please!


Paul S
 Share

Recommended Posts

If the p/ups on the BB5000 are as powerfull as on the BB3000, then it'll eclipse the BB425. A couple of months back, whilst setting up the bass sound for a recording session at a local studio, the techie was surprised to learn my BB3000 wasn't active. He was well impressed.

No disrespect to the BB425 mind, it's a cracking bass. It's just that the saying 'the BB3000 is like a Fender P on steroids' is not far off the mark. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

I had a 1980s BB2000 for a while; traded it in against another bass and now really wish I'd kept it. 

Unusual in being a through neck and having a reverse P bridge pickup.  For a passive bass it was awesomely clean and punchy.   If I ever see one for sale, I probably buy it ... was there ever a 5-string version of that bass?  If so I'm going hunting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had a bb614 ,bb424x and a bb1000s I liked them all,the 614 had a different neck profile to the 424 

I preferred the 614 neck was really comfortable to play,just felt right to me.

I still own the bb1000s as I always wanted a neck thru bb and it does sound great and sits nicely in my  little collection of 80s Japanese basses mine is a 1985. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Googled bb5000 and the first result was "why are bb5000s so hard to find". I guess it's because 5 string basses weren't comon in the 80s.


Anyway, the bb5000 appears to have a normal not a reverse p neck pickup (reverse being the "correct" way imho), so not quite a 5 string bb2000.

I found a bb2004 which is an active bb2000 and a bb2005 which is a 5-string version .. but that one has two J pickups.  The search continues.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m normally a fender jazz or Sandberg fan ,   but I’ve had my BB 415 about 3 weeks now and really can’t fault it in any way,  I like the pickup switch , it makes it really easy to change between tones quickly, and the lows on this are great . Also the nut width is about 43 mm , which I didn’t think was bad for a 5 string,   Imo they are well worth the money 🙂

 

25058091-0E0C-4E92-B53D-659C7704B35C.jpeg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, TheGreek said:

I've just noticed how the B string on the bridge is set back...never seen that before..

I believe it’s to add tension to the String,  and something to do with  the pitch , but I’m not entirely sure,    Maybe someone could answer this 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Reggaebass said:

I believe it’s to add tension to the String,  and something to do with  the pitch , but I’m not entirely sure,    Maybe someone could answer this 🙂

It's to make sure you have enough room behind the saddle when you intonate it, since the B saddle ends up positioned the furthest back. Bit of a crap design if you ask me, they should just reposition or enlarge the bridge so that it doesn't look wonky!

Edited by dannybuoy
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...