Stub Mandrel

Had this since my late teens.

You've never heard Freebird before?

I first heard it maybe 45 years ago? It still amazes and moves me.

You have just had an amazing epihany, I envy you.

1 hour ago, Simon C said:

I agree Dave, there is something special about playing in a 3 piece when you get it together.  I find drums, bass and guitar (with a couple of us singing) the easiest line-up to keep tight - I guess because it’s easier to hear 3 band members and lock in together than it is to hear 4 or 5.

What's  great about a 3 piece is it's easy to change things or even make it up on the spot.

Squier Wiki has incomplete information on the strat. Says the body is 'popular' and they are made in ... China!

Dpd - dodgy parcel destruction.

Whoops!

8 hours ago, dmccombe7 said:

12 hours ago, TimR said:

Stage Right is right hand side looking from the stage towards the audience.

 

House Right is righthand of the stage looking at the stage from the audience (house). 

Expand  

The thread had gone too far and wasn't worth trying to correct it now but nice to hear it explained.

I wasn't aware of house right and left, so that's a bonus.

Dave

What are PA left and right?

10 hours ago, LeftyJ said:

We also liked to incorporate little moments where band members made eye contact and faced eachother

This is a big thing with the blues three piece band. I 'react' to Alex's solos and we sometimes trade licks or play complementary lines/riffs. On one sone we sometimes do manic tapping. It all helps create a bit of spectacle.

4 hours ago, tegs07 said:

What you are experiencing is the difference between software run in a corporate environment and bound by the policies and security settings of that environment versus software that is not tied down by any restrictions.

I think what I am suffering from is organisations who know how to set up their internal security, but can't cope when their subcontractors have different arrangements. I have my own, one-person, company. I have my own data protection registration, policies, automated off-site and on-site backups, anti-malware, anti-ransomware and independent licences for an impressive array of software. Also, I am Windows based while they are largely Mac based. This causes everything from minor irritations to major issues now and again with software and even issues with policies - no I am NOT going to implement YOUR safe working policy because I have MINE, and it applies to ALL my work not just yours.

19 minutes ago, tegs07 said:

The functionality of Teams (or slack or whatever else you like) is infinitely preferable than email and printed copies).

Teams is for online meetings, greatly inferior to Zoom for online meetings.

It took 30 minutes for a consultant to set up a Team meeting last week, in the end had to set up a new one and re-invite everyone.

I once had one with a Local Authority, utter disaster - their security rules meant their meeting had to be teams. After over three hours of increasingly frustrated emails and phone calls, I set up a meeting on Zoom or Google meet in about five minutes, which they could join as it was an 'external' meeting.

Teams is an absolutely useless productivity killer.

25 minutes ago, neepheid said:

What about that massive gap between the top end of Squiers and the least expensive Fenders?  Are they just going to leave that to the likes of Sire then?

I think @LeftyJ is right, quality wise there's not much to call between CV and VM Squiers and Fender Player whatever the logo snobs say. Certainly, the Squier Anniversary models were the equal of any entry level Fender.

They are walking a narrow line to keep the Fenders as 'premium' instruments.

I saw a GuitarGuitar video yesterday comparing Gibson and Epiphone 335s with a 10:1 cost ratio. They sounded a bit different but...

11 minutes ago, LeftyJ said:

I don't understand these, to be honest. That's not that far below the recently introduced Sonic series, and close to (I think slightly above) the discontinued Bullet series. Doesn't seem to add a whole lot. 

I forgot those! It's an insane level of market segmentation. I assume they want to compete at every level. It's hard to see what meaningful differences there can be between £129 and £155 basses without making the cheapest deliberately cruder.

12 minutes ago, asingardenof said:

The functionality isn't quite as good using the web apps though, otherwise I'd agree.

100% Outlook is very clunky on the web version compared to the localised one.

11 minutes ago, tegs07 said:

Sounds like they are running physical infrastructure from the dark ages. I haven’t dealt with an on premise exchange server for nearly a decade…

Exchange is virtualised these days, but it gets itchy about security and that starts a very awkward path.

3 minutes ago, tegs07 said:

I run office 365 on a Chromebook and a Mac?

 

Physically installed software is no longer required.

I have to use a physically installed version of Office as it's the only way to keep my Office 365 separate from a client's (I use the somewhat simplified and less versatile online version for this). Otehrwise their Exchange server tries to take over my system as they have a 'higher' level product.

47 minutes ago, tegs07 said:

I also work in IT and what people run as an OS is becoming less and less important to us, nor is the device they are using whether it’s an iPad or a PC.

Microsoft are supplying the glue to hold all of this together and make it secure. 

 

CA, modern auth, Ark, sentinel, intune(endpoint), office 365, team’s voice etc etc etc

 

Btw a properly implemented auto pilot deployment with a sys admin that knows how to use endpoint will solve all the problems you have listed.

 

 

Yes, it would be wonderful if they could invent a version of Teams that allows me to run the app in less than twenty-five minutes and four log-on attempts (I just use the online version now).

Or perhaps find a way to send me updates without rendering my computer unusable for half a morning.

Or even, just possibly, sort out why my laptop boots from cold in half a minute and my PC takes ten minutes plus, running the same O/S when the (less than three year old) PC is far more powerful and also has an SSD.

Fender/Squier have made a determined assault on the entry level market with the new 'debut' series on Amazon for £129.

Looks like they are squaring up to Glarry in the USA and Harley Benton over here, even cheaper than the Squier mini-P.

This suggests the market is segmenting even further with Squier having almost as many 'levels' as Fender with affinity, CV, paranormal and Anniversary models.

If anyone drops the cash on one, it would be useful to know how these square up as beginners' instruments. I'm assuming these are going to be closer to the old Korean budget jobs than recent models.

Site stripe link .... https://amzn.to/3U1lAVW

It seems PJB is the way to go for bedroom rigs.

I find the C2 isn't loud enough to compete with a drumkit, even with a TE Elf, though two C2s or a C4 might just make it.  I've used it for open mics though.

4 hours ago, Bluewine said:

 

 

Looks like your another " upfront " guy.

 

Daryl

 

I try!

On 20/04/2024 at 15:31, Musicman666 said:

well taking the logic to its ultimate conclusion wouldn't that be all we really need regardless of fretless or fretted ..just the dots along the leading edge, everything else would presumably be decorative fluff? 

That's how my fretless is, it is all one needs.

Actually... does this answer the question?

Yep, you wont do better than a hercules, but I'd avoid that model - the little support is always ending up inbthe wrong place. I have one in my practice spot.

For gigs I have two of the ones where the bodyrests against two padded legs. Much better.

Next to the snare.

Fretless basses with dot markers on the side of the neck where they would be on a fretted bass.