Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

mouthmw

Member
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About mouthmw

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

mouthmw's Achievements

Collaborator

Collaborator (7/14)

8

Total Watts

  1. This is how Sansamp was designed to be used. If you have a good amp & cab, you don't need any extra preamps muddying things up in front of it. Sansamp is excellent for sending an emulated amp&cab tone to FOH or for using it straight to audio interface to record or just jam with it.
  2. Precisely. Higher headroom means it takes a stronger (louder) signal before it starts distorting / compressing. In some cases, the tone itself can feel bigger, more 3D, more expansive.
  3. I just got JPTR FX Jive 2 days ago, and it's pretty much perfect for low gain tones / dirty boost needs. I also got the best synth tone in combination with my octaver when I used the third diode switch, better than other fuzz pedals I tried for that type of thing (but I never owned a gated type of fuzz which might work just as well or better, those aren't my cup of tea).
  4. I have the Octabvre mkiii, and I've tested it against OC2, OC5 and MXR BOD. They don't sound the same. Octabvre mkiii won't get you that classic OC2 hollow tone, even with the tone all the way off and Tim switch engaged (for more lows). Octabvre has more mids and is more pronounced in the mix, sounds fuller, which I love. But it won't do that OC2 thing (which admittedly has a very infectious sound). I'd say MXR got closer to that tone (but not quite there either), and OC5 is almost identical to OC2 in vintage mode. I haven't even noticed latency with OC5 and you get more gain on tap compared to OC2. Once you start upping the tone on Octabvre, it really gets closer to Mutron and even further away from OC2. The gain on tap is fantastic on Octabvre, and you can easily solo the sub with its separate control. I didn't like tracking on MXR, and found Octabvre and OC5 to be pretty close tracking wise, but Octabvre to me remains the best tracking analog octaver. I've tested those pedals with my passive P bass and my 3 band Stingray.
  5. Just heard this song on the radio for the first time (not a huge James Brown fan, but I do dig 70s funk in general). First thing I noticed was how out of tune bass is, so I had to check out the song and listen again on my headphones. Yup, super out of tune.
  6. I did choose only one octave pedal, and that pedal was 3Leaf Octabvre MKIII. It's the best analog octave pedal IMO. It does the OC2 and Mutron thing, and everything in between.
  7. I mean, you're quoting L1K as an old school tone but L2K in your opinion cannot do old school tones? You can get most of L1K's tones with L2K in neck pup position. They're in the same (P bass) position. It's the same MFD pickup. L2K does passive too (active mode is just a buffer or a buffer + treble boost anyways, not a standard active EQ in any way, shape or form). You can't do OMG mode, sure, but honestly, series mode has plenty enough of bass (I always cut some bass and treble anyways) and you can shape the tone to be pretty damn old school. You can't do single coil without a K-mod either, but IMO you don't go L1K or L2K for single coil tones. YMMV. L2K's neck pup gives a good fat P bass like tone, and with some mods (if you really need them) does everything L1K does. L series are not really modern sounding basses, M series does a standard active bass + EQ type of thing, but L series basses have always been more old school tone wise.
  8. I'm pretty much counting on having all gigs cancelled until at least June, maybe even July. We've had a busy schedule planned this year, but it's all off now. I didn't have a single weekend (Friday, Saturday) free until May, and probably would have filled that up too, until Covid that is.
  9. Boomy tone? Nope. Sounds like eq ignorance. One trick? Whatever. What it is - awesome and fits fantastically into a mix. I've got 2 of em. One with flats, one with rounds. EMG GZR on both. Love em. I can make em grunt, I can make em mellow out, tone control and hand position bring me all the variety I need from them. I guess I have a thing for "one trick ponies" as all I play are Precisions and Stingrays lol.
  10. If any of the photos shows the back of the body, you can tell it's active if it has a battery box. If there's no box, it's a passive model.
  11. £300 is a great price if it's in good condition. They go for quite a bit more on Reverb these days, damn price hikes. Things I'd check - I wouldn't want it to be too heavy, I'd want it to be an active 2eq model (not the passive one) and the obvious neck in good condition part (truss rod, frets).
  12. No, they all came with the painted black neck. It was a cost saving thing, and they were still losing money on them. A lot of people stripped the finish though, so that's what you're seeing there. Somebody stripped it and refinished it, or just stripped the paint and left the sealer coat on. Either way, ask the seller about details.
  13. I've had Nordstrand MM4.2 and Aguilar AG4M. Used Nordy with John East 3 band preamp and with an original Stingray 2 band preamp. It has a nice, warm tone, but a bit too tame for my taste. You lose the big Stingray lows and get low mids instead, and it doesn't quite do it for me IMO. I preferred the Aguilar AG4M to it, sounded great with the original Stingray 2 band preamp. Nordy worked better with John East than the original 2 band preamp for me too, thanks to the sweepable mids where I could pinpoint the frequencies of the pickup and boost/cut how I'd need (usually boosting a bit of low mids). I now how a 2 bander and a 90s 3 bander, stock pups and preamps. Definitely prefer them stock, but if I had to pick an aftermarket pickup, I'd probably go Aguilar AG4M.
  14. Had this exact combo in my previous 3 band Stingray because I wanted it to sound like a 2 band ray. Fantastic preamp and pickup combo IMO. Preamp alone would have done it to be honest, the Nordy pickup is a bit more polite than the stock pickup (at least, the stock Stingray pickup). It seems to focus more on the low mids and doesn't go as low as the stock pup. I tried the Nordy MM4.2 with: - John East MMSR - best results, I always bumped the low mids a bit, cut bass and treble just a tad. Great Sade like tone. - Norstrand MM preamp - pretty good, close to a 2 band Stingray, but still a bit too polite for me. Vintage, sure, but polite vintage. - original Stingray 2 band preamp - similar to Nordy preamp, but I noticed more mids and a bit more forward tone. Weird phase cancellation though - if I were to crank the bass and treble controls all the way, I'd effectively lose the low end and end up with a tinny tone. Probably because the Nordstrand doesn't go quite as low, being more low mid focused. Putting the original Stingray pickup back with the 2 band preamp solved the issue and was the best pairing with the original preamp IMO.
  15. Yeah, well, if you're getting the action height they way you want it (meaning low enough), it's not a problem. Any other things that get on your nerves on your Classic? I'd probably prefer a top load stringing instead of body through (I tried body through on a Jazz bass once, and didn't like the perceived increase in string tautness). Slab body I didn't mind on my old USA SUB. I guess weight would be a concern, if it's heavy.
×
×
  • Create New...