Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

MoonBassAlpha

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    3,846
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MoonBassAlpha

  1. Thanks for chipping in @Andyjr1515,  I love your work and value your opinion!

    It does seem rather doomed, agreed. 

    I've got the poor thing clamped right now to see if it might correct the bow, truss rod loosened. 

    I've just had a thought today. 

    The neck was badly checked all up and down, especially near the head, but none anywhere on the body. 

    I'm thinking this could have been leant against a hot radiator,  and the string tension has set the neck in a bow.

    Anyhow,  I'll leave it clamped for a few days,  may even warm it up, nothing to lose now 

  2. 41 minutes ago, 3below said:

    With a single action truss rod the ultimate bad result of this situation is that the fretboard cracks and parts company with the neck.  Personal experience with a USA bass, sorted by Jon Shuker and came back better than before.

    I imagine the cost of this type of repair wouldn't be far off the cost of a replacement neck? 

    Did this involve a refret too?

  3. Hi hive mind.

    I  got a guitar(telecaster) in for setup with quite a bad bow, about 1.5mm relief in the middle of the neck.

    I  took it off the guitar and loosened the truss rod nut,  still a small bow.

    As I tighten the nut the neck just doesn't move at all. There's also evidence of a small split in the middle of the fretboard at the 1st fret, though the fret isn't raised.

    The nut is captive behind the usual Fender walnut plug. 

    My first thought is to try and correct the bow by clamping with blocks in a workmate possibly under gentle warning. 

    Second thought is removing the nut and adding a couple of washers to give more range of movement,  but I think this is less likely to work. 

    Additional info,  '93 US Telecaster,  rosewood board,  skunk stripe .

    Any useful input welcomed,  before I start going the clamping route .

    Cheers folks!

  4. 8 minutes ago, Grahambythesea said:

    I always thought they were surprisingly heavy for what appears to be a relatively small body & a short neck. How’s yours?

    I think this era are quite light. I have a 74 SG special that is very light,  the body is a bit thinner than usual,  I think.

    I  suspect these are the same. 

  5. 48 minutes ago, tvickey said:

     

    Just curious which shop you picked this up from?  There seemed to be a few of these walnut Rics that hit the UK last year... and then they quickly seemed to vanish / get sold!

    I was looking on Andertons site, and they suggested that Rick's are being produced in smaller numbers,  and there can be a long wait to get them (and the prices seem to be going up too).

    Maybe it IS a good time to sell after all...

  6. I think particularly chunky rings can wear the  neck finish. The Rick I recently bought has relatively no fret wear but a  fair bit on the finish of the neck that I can only imagine was caused by finger and thumb rings. A bit odd really!

    • Like 1
  7. This is a coincidence! My mate has just got a slightly earlier version of the same thing, about 1970, with the slotted headstock and the neck pickup up against the fingerboard. I'd love to try it,  but it's up north and I'm not!

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...