Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

geoham

Member
  • Posts

    804
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by geoham

  1. I've got a guitarist just like it. We've now got him amp-free using a single guitar, via a Roland hex-pickup system. He can get the sound of pretty much any guitar, amp or even tuning on demand. Still messes around between songs. It's a case of - find the patch, play a few chords, kick in the 'solo' effect, play a quick lick, switch back. Then we're good to go.

     

    To be fair, while we work to a setlist - we rarely stick rigidly to it - trying to accommodate requests or move things around a bit depending on the crowd.

     

    Our keyboard player has two boards with many more sounds - he just has a patch number written against every song on the set list. Does it in moments without issue.

     

    I don't know if there's a solution... guitarists being guitarists! 

  2. On 28/08/2021 at 11:10, Newfoundfreedom said:

     

    No it's really not. They're not refusing to release your money. They're asking you to prove that you are who you say you are before they release the money. That's a massive difference. It's absolutely standard practice, and in fact, the law, which companies have to abide by. I've done it hundreds of times without a single issue. I've even been asked by some companies to send a "selfie" holding my passport up next to my face to prove that I am the authorised passport holder, and but just trying to pull a scam with stolen I.D. 

    I'd be far more worried if companies weren't making these checks. 

     

    It's called a KYC (know your costumer). It's 100% legit and totally standard practice. Plenty of information online. 

     

    https://bis.lexisnexis.co.uk/due-diligence-and-compliance/glossary/kyc-check

     

    I agree, it does seem like a KYC process. 

     

    If the company are moving money around, they'll be required to ensure that the recipient isn't subject to sanctions and to minimise the risk of money laundering. If you're being asked to provide an ID document, it'll likely be paired with a selfie and include a liveliness check (to prevent you just taking a photo of a photo).

     

    I doubt that the company want to do this - it costs them money to do each check, plus the effort to develop this solution. However, they've probably deemed it necessary to remain compliant from regulatory perspective. I suspect any effort to get them to release money without doing this is going to be like banging your head against a brick wall.

  3. 10 hours ago, DaytonaRik said:

     

    We swapped to rehearsing with quieter backline and relying on monitoring either via wedges or IEMs a long time ago and it makes such a difference to live performances.  No more arguments about how loud backline is, no volume wars between guitarists band members - just a tweak in their own mix and viola!

     

    It needs investment - not only in equipment but time both to a) mic cabs, setup wedges etc etc at the rehearsal and b) to get things to the point where you have 'ready to go' base-line settings for gigs - but it's worth it on both counts.

     

    In the current setup with 2 monitors are you running a compromise mix @geoham i.e. those two wedges providing monitoring for multiple band members?  If so then it's unlikely you'll get something that works for everyone, just a poor compromise that just winds everyone up.

     

    I do feel your pain as band leader, bass player, PA/Lighting owner/operator and backing vocalist!

     

     

    We do this but to prevent excessive lead guitar volumes in monitor mixes by applying a limiter to 2nd guitar channel only feeding the monitors.

     

    We have been using just two wedges for everyone. It was all our old desk would handle, never mind the very limited spaces we play in.

     

    Thankfully we’ve made part of the investment already. Nobody is using an amp these days. Amp modelling for both the guitarist and I. Keyboard player has ditched his amp too. 

     

    The digital desk will be getting its first outing tomorrow. A couple of us on in-ears, The other three can share two monitors, and I think that one of them will invest in in-ears soon enough.

     

    George

  4. 9 hours ago, moley6knipe said:

    I’d love to go in ear but never going to happen because the other lads are dinosaurs. I always gig with ACS plugs in due to Mesa Boogie / crash cymbal damage.

     

    Given lack of in ears the best solution I’ve found is 1) get the guitarist’s amps up to ear level (on a pub table) 2) get higher fidelity vocal monitors also up to ear level - these https://www.tc-helicon.com/product.html?modelCode=P0CMI have been a revelation. Small enough to sit on shelves, tables or mount on mic stands. 

    That’s an interesting looking monitor. Perhaps worth looking at.

  5. 11 minutes ago, Muppet said:

    I think get him to try some decent in ears and he'll never go back.  Tried this with two singers who both bought budget sets and hated them, another bought a more expensive set up and it suited them better. Poor quality In ears can ruin the switch

    The keyboard player and I have KZ ZS10s, which seem pretty decent for what they cost. I've never had anything more expensive to compare it to though.

    • Like 1
  6. 24 minutes ago, nilebodgers said:

    Easy solution now you have a digital desk - compressor insert on his channel set for fast attack and a high ratio with the threshold set so it isn’t quite activating on his soundcheck loudest level. He can turn up as much as he likes after that and it won’t get any louder.

    What an awesome idea!

  7. 1 hour ago, chris_b said:

    Is the singer asking for more monitors because the guitarist is too loud? I know a guitarist actually turning down is the ninth wonder of the world, so maybe turn his amp away from the singer.

     

    There's definitely an element of that. We've got the guitarist using an amp-free modelling setup, which is reasonably new (maybe a year before Covid started). but he always keeps a little back!

     

    To give an example, we were setting up recently and the input from his pedal was barely registering a signal on the desk. Asked him to turn up full, as I'd almost maxed the gain on his channel. So here we are with the gain and the fader both pretty high and he's not that loud at all. Other channels were adjusted to compensate. Three songs in and I'm sure I don't need to tell you the rest....

     

    George

  8. 8 minutes ago, jrixn1 said:

    Our singers seem to prefer not to use in-ears, although they understand the overall benefits of a quieter stage.  One has said to me his ideal setup is him with a floor monitor, everyone else on in-ears — you could try that?  But at least have everyone download the mixer app, so they can do their own mixes (whether that's wedges or in-ears) and not have to rely on you doing it for them.

    I think that's quite a sensible suggestion. While it seems reasonably common, I'm not sure sure I understand the objections myself. I rarely sing, but when I do I need to hear myself very clearly or I'm out of tune. 


    The guitarist will take some convincing... he'd still prefer to bring his Marshall 4x12 to a tiny pub gig, but that's a whole other thread!

    • Like 1
  9. A slight rant and advice seeking request!

    It's great to be back gigging again. We play a variety of covers in pubs, and I do the sound. We're currently using two floor monitors, but have just upgraded our aging mixer to a digital one with enough aux channels to run an in-ear set up.

    My singer spends as much time asking for himself to be turned up as he does singing, and frequently mid-song. To give an example, we were playing Hysteria by Muse on Saturday (a nice relaxed one on the bass). Mid-song, he turns round signalling to turn him up. Yeah, I'll just squeeze that in between these constant 16ths...

    Inevitably the monitors are pushed to point of feedback, especially when he starts moving the mic around bit. I do try turning others down instead, but I then struggle with my guitarist (ampless modelling setup) who always has extra volume at source, despite me asking for his loudest possible signal while setting the gain on his channel!

     

    In ears are the perfect solution as far as I'm concerned - lower stage stage volume and everyone can hear exactly what they want without worrying about feedback. Also the added bonus that I can hopefully put more focus on playing bass and less on maintaining an acceptable stage mix.

    The singer however is rather resistant to the idea. They'll kill the vibe apparently... 

     

    I'm sure I'm not the only one is a situation like this - what are the rest of you doing?

  10. We've only opened up in Scotland recently. You need to wear a mask at a pub or club, unless you are drinking or dancing. Not sure why you'd be there otherwise, but that's another conversation!

     

    We had one gig just before the week before the relaxation of restrictions. We played to an all-seated crowd in an normally rowdy pub, so quite surreal. Especially when folk repeatedly got up to dance and were asked to sit down.

     

    I've had two since then - a pub gig on Saturday, and a wedding the Saturday before.

     

    The wedding was mostly uneventful, although we did apparently cause some guests to complain about the noise.( We're not especially loud. Guitar, bass and keys all DI'd (no amps), and only the kick mic'd on the drums. A bus load of pensioners had arrived from Devon or somewhere, and couldn't get to sleep. At 9pm. On a Saturday. In a city centre hotel with two function suites. The staff didn't seem particularly used to having a band play, seemed slightly clueless with organisation... a sign of the times I suspect. Anyway, their response was to assure the compaining guests we'd turn down, then repeatedly complain to me when I literally couldn't get it any quieter. Kick mic off, master fader waaay down.

     

    The pub gig - in Stirling of all places - was crazy mental. People seemed much merrier and up for a good time than they have before in this venue. Which was slightly problematic, because it's small and they end up dancing inches away from the frontman. Lost power to both monitors at one point! A drunk lady's backside had landed on one, and knocked the kettle lead out in the process. Not sure about the other, but the kettle lead was out of that too. It took a moaning singer for me to realise! However, despite this - the gig was a lot of fun and it's great to be back!

     

    George

    • Like 1
  11. Hopefully the end of this tale... Got the amp back on Saturday. VDR and internal fuse replaced. Working fine at home volumes. I'm very pleased. A by product of this is that I now have a backup amp, in the form of the Trace Elliot Elf. Or perhaps this one is the backup. Time will tell! I'll perhaps take it to this Saturday's gig with me to put it through its paces.

     

    George

  12. 5 minutes ago, Doddy said:

    Even in a situation like that, I'd rather have a bunch of decent individual pedals than a multi effects. Yes, a multi will generally be a cheaper way of getting the sounds, but I've always preferred the sound of standalone pedals and find them far easier to use, especially on the fly.

    If you're going without an amp, it's easy to put a decent DI box at the end of your pedal chain, so that's not a big deal really.

    Each to their own. You are absolutley correct that it is can be easier to tweak the sound of individual pedals on the fly, and that they'll often sound better than a multi-fx - though this is less true today than it was in the past. 

     

    However - they're not necessarily far easier to use. To give a real life example, I use the Sansamp model on my Helix. I have it programmed differently within different patches though. I use it with the treble cranked but not too much drive in a patch I use for Sledgehammer. I also use it with lots of drive a general purpose patch. To acheive this with individual pedals, I'm either needing to buy the same pedal more than once - or try and adjust them mid set. With my Helix, it's just one pedal to press.

     

    There's also things like split paths, switching multiple pedals on/off at once that make life easier on a multi-effects. Yes, you can acheive this in the analogue world, just not very easily. Not to mention the fuss of patch cables and powering a bunch of individual pedals - along with the associated noise it can bring.

     

    However, what I will definitely concede is that to get the best from a multi effects is that you need to spend time with it - understanding how it works and programming it to suit your needs. The built in presets are rarely what you want. You can't just drop it in like you would an individual pedal and expect it to sound good. For this reason, a multi-effects really isn't for everyone.

     

    George

    • Like 3
  13. 17 hours ago, BadHands said:

    Personally, I'd recommend against this and to try an individual pedal you like the sound of.

    I'd say it depends on the scenario...

     

    If you want to try out a lot of effects, get a multi-effects. The Zoom ones are very cost effective and sound good. This may guide you down a path of individual effects once you know what you are after.
     

    If you need to have many different sounds - for example in a covers band - then a multi-effects will often be a better choice than lots of different pedals. There are a few reasons for this - cost, simplicity/size of setup and simplicity of switching between sounds. Also, this type of rig lends itself well to a amp-free, low-stage volume in-ear setup - popular with wedding bands and the like. 

     

    However if your needs are simpler and you know what you need - for example in an originals band - then a few individual pedals probably makes more sense. There's no point buying a Helix pedal when you just need a good drive and octave pedal. It's not to say you can't have a more complex pedal board - many people do and love them! 

     

    George

    • Thanks 1
  14. 2 minutes ago, BassAdder27 said:

    Ok this comment may be a bit hard for some to relate to but using a pick on the bass to me has opened up my bass tone more so than a pedal or amp EQ 

     

    I know there are pick haters in the bass world but it’s the one method that really brings out the tone of a bass and adds to volume and clarity out of an amp.

     

    Its worth trying it and you will hear tones that are often flubby in comparison using fingers 

     

    Try it and see 

    You are absolutely correct. There's no doubt a pick can have a massive impact on your tone. There's about half a dozen covers in our set where it's a necessity as far as I'm concerned. It's a skill that all bassists should have in their arsenal.

     

    George

    • Like 1
  15. I've done both, and for me it depends on what I'm playing.

     

    When I've played in originals bands, I normally keep the same sound for much of the often short set and usually just went straight to the amp. I did use effects occasionally in my most recent originals band - mostly amp simulation or a Sansamp patch on my Zoom B3. The goal was a consistent tone when playing via shared backlines which are common at originals gigs. But if was able to use my own amp at every gig I wouldn't have bothered with effects. In my first couple of originals bands, I don't even think I could have afforded any effects!

     

    When playing covers, I use effects extensively - these days via a Helix. Basically, I normally have about 40 songs to do in a night covering a fair mix of material and need to be able to get a sound quickly. I have two basic tones that cover much of the set and I tweak with pickup selection and the tone knob. One is a traditional sounding clean tone -  think the Eagles, Rolling Stones, Ocean Colour Scene. The other is a more mid-focused slightly driven Ampeg SVT style sound - covering things like the Who, Stranglers, Biffy Clyro. I've also got these patches set up with switchable drive (of varying degrees!), octave and chorus. There are also a few songs in the set with their own dedicated patches - Hysteria (Muse), Figure it Out (Royal Blood) and Sledgehammer.

     

  16. I've recently purchased an Elf head and am blown away with how great it is. While I don't need new cabs - I have a pair of already light and punchy TC Electronic RS112s - the Elf cabs are taking up too much time in the GAS section of my brain. They do look pretty though. And a smaller footprint the the TC Electronic ones - it's at premium in the pubs we play....

     

     

  17. I'd agree it's worth having a peak inside it. On some amps there may be fuse that you can access without needing to even open it - it'll probably be somewhere near the power lead.

     

    I've had to replace internal fuses on a few amps over the years. If a fuse looks visibly blown (or you can test with a multimeter) -  and there's no other visible damage then it's definitely worth a try. 

     

    Recently I also had a slightly more expensive amp fail - TC Electronic BH550. A VDR had blown, taking the internal fuse with it.

    It's currently with a retired tech, who got it up and running without the VDR. It's apparently needed in the circuit for safety, so it's currently waiting on a replacement coming from China - at a cost of under £5 delivered. I'll need to give the guy a few quid for his efforts too - but I shouldn't be too much out of pocket.

     

    George

    • Like 1
  18. On 07/08/2021 at 17:03, MoonBassAlpha said:

    It's entirely possible that it's just the vdr itself that has failed,  for no particular reason. 

    I’ve spent some time reading about VDRs, and this seems entirely plausible. It doesn’t seem particularly rare, and I wonder how many otherwise working devices are scrapped as a result. 

     

    The guy trying fix my amp seems to think this is likely the case too, and the amp is currently working with the VDR simply removed from the circuit. He’s waiting on a replacement being delivered from China - hopefully it should be returned to me in the next few days.

     

    George

  19. 1 hour ago, BigRedX said:

     

    A totally unnecessary expense for an originals band. Just about every gig I have done over the last 20 years (many hundreds) the PA has been supplied by the venue and in most cases has been far superior to anything a band could afford. The number of gigs I have done during this time where the there was no in-house PA are literately a handful and all were in venues that don't usually have bands playing; and in each case it was cheap and easy to hire in a suitable PA system.

     

    The money would be far better spent on merch - T-Shirts CD/Vinyl etc, where unlike a PA the costs can easily be recouped if the band are suitably entertaining.

    Definitely agree - in over 20 years I’ve never played an originals gig where the PA was supplied.

     

    The opposite is almost true for pub covers bands!

  20. I'd mostly agree with the above advice - learn the original parts and mostly stick to them.

     

    I went through a similar experience several years ago - I did make some tasteful tweaks in appropriate places (well that was the intention!). The original guy's parts were a wee bit dull, mostly just mirroring the rhythm guitar - which is fine in many bands, but I like to try and be a little more melodic. I got away with it and got some compliments. Though, I think that doing such things sparingly is important - little hints of what you could bring to the table and make the band better.

     

    George

    • Like 1
  21. 1 minute ago, vinorange said:

    I went on a bass maintenance course, rather than the build course and Jon was brilliant. I took 2 basses, both of which had a full neck off set up guided by Jon as part of the course. He's an absolute gent as well as an amazing guitar builder.

     

    As a result I've shipped out my Fenders in favour of 2 of Jon's creations.

     

    Meet the Shukers.

    20210806_105422.jpg

     

    That reverse headstock one is particularly nice!

    • Like 2
  22. I do have occasional GAS for other instruments. I used to play a bit of guitar, and had a bit of GAS for a new one a few years ago. When the missus asked me what I wanted for Christmas, I suggested a cheap six-string guitar to mess about with at home. I then praised my guitarist mate's new Telecaster, said I could be doing with something similar myself, knowing she'd ask his advice. I wake up on the big day with a six-string bass under the tree! Note quite what I had in mind, but very nice all the same!

     

    I also occasionally toy with learning other instruments. I fancied sax, just because it's cool. I've also considered leaning bagpipes, after noticing a fair demand for them up here in Scotland - particularly during peak wedding season and hogmanay. No need to align diaries with other folk or share the takings! Didn't follow through though...

     

    George

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...