Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

6v6

Member
  • Posts

    594
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 6v6

  1. Definitely interested - don't post much on here any more, but @Phil Starr FYI I'm still regularly gigging the SM212 based 1x12 you helped me design way back in 2013!

     

    The 1x12 is perfect for pub gigs but something like this would be really handy as an alternative for rehearsals and small/acoustic gigs.

    • Like 2
  2. On 13/06/2022 at 17:05, BigJHW said:

     

    How you getting on with the KZ ZS10's? I read a lot of reviews on them but also read they struggle in a live environment and they're better for studio or gaming - so very mixed reviews.. I liked them due to their price, but am also leaning towards the mackie MP-360's - a LOT more expensive than the ZS10's but reviews for bass seem to be good.

     

    For the price, impressions are very good - the build quality (particularly cables) and fit definitely isn't as good as Shure, and they're not as flat/accurate as the SE535s, but live so far I'm choosing the ZS10s over my Shures (I have both 215s and 535s).

     

    • Like 1
  3. I've been down this route recently with one of my bands, only done a couple of gigs so far but FWIW here's a summary of my experiences:

     

    Started out using Shure SE535 (which I already had) - these have a very flat response which I found wasn't ideal so I got some KZ ZS10s (as suggested in one of the existing IEM threads) and I'm very impressed for the cost, the bass response is significantly stronger.

     

    Preamp - I use an HX Stomp direct to the desk, personally I didn't find the amp/cab models worked that well in a live mix, so instead I'm using a compressor block and the ZeroAmp Bass DI.  I don't normally use compression, but without any natural amp/cab compression it's helpful.

     

    I'm also considering moving away from the HX stomp (at least live, it's a handy thing for recording/practice) since I don't use 99% of the features, probably will try a compressor and preamp pedal (Sansamp or maybe Origin Effects Bass Rig).

    • Like 1
  4. 18 hours ago, Phil Starr said:

    OMG why haven't I done that with my router, such an obvious idea, and your workshop is so clean and tidy compared with mine. :)

    +1 great idea - I've got a small shop-bought router table but it's too small for this kind of work, this setup looks way more flexible and a better use of space! 👍

    • Like 2
  5. Hi all, not been on the forum for quite a while but just checked out this thread and the cab design looks great! 👍

    I built a DIY cab back in 2013 (using the Beyma SM212, similar to the v1 basschat cab design) and it's been great, still gigging it now.

    May get some bigger gigs soon, and also starting to use some FX which may benefit from a full-range cab (current one is only a single driver), so this new design looks ideal.

    Would this likely pair OK with the existing cab or would it be better to build two (one with no mid/tweeter/crossover) as a modular solution?

    Any info on the flatpack kits?  Looks like a great time-saver vs sourcing locally and cutting it all up myself 😀

     

    • Like 2
  6. [quote name='Root45' timestamp='1493042700' post='3285107']
    Nitro is available in aerosols, and is not difficult to do.
    [/quote]

    I've done a couple and it's definitely do-able, but I'd personally say it is quite difficult and very time consuming to get a good finish, particularly for refinishes where you invariably miss some tiny damage before laying down the primer and end up sanding it all off again (don't ask my how I know this, gah!)

    The materials are also quite expensive, and unless you have a spray-booth it's very weather dependent as you can't really spray in very cold or wet weather and get good results.

  7. I've found that an efficient 1x12 is adequate in a 4 piece blues/rock outfit, fwiw, obviously not all cabs are the same but there's plenty that claim good efficiency nowadays (mine is similar to the basschat v1 Diy design)

    If the cab starts to struggle (only happened a couple of times in 4 years) it invariably means the stage volume is too high, and in these circumstances audience members report that they can no longer hear the (normally not micd except kick) drums clearly.

    If the drums are micd in a bigger venue you can just Di the bass to get some extra projection through the pa, so you still don't really need a huge pile of speakers - the stage sound should remain pretty constant regardless of venue size, the pa just gets bigger (which would include more monitoring on big stages, but I just make do in pub gigs by putting my cab near the drummer so he can hear it clearly).


  8. I'll go out on a limb and guess that at least 90% of current production ones do not used starved plate mode.



    That is my impression too, and I've been studying various guitar and bass amp schematics for years.

    Admittedly there aren't that many hybrid bass amp schematics available, particularly for the newer class D stuff, but think about it from an amp designers point of view - what's easier, copy/paste one of a few classic and well understood tube preamp circuits and specify one extra winding on your transformer, or mess around trying to make a tube circuit sound good running tubes outside their normal operating range?

    Unless you're running stuff on batteries it's a no-brainer IMO (yes, I'm an engineer, and yes I am lazy! xD)

    The facts are out there in the schematics that are available, I've not found a any that show a mains powered amp running tubes at weirdly low "starved plate" voltages, but I'd be happy to study such a diagram if one exists.

  9. Thanks passinwind, but I don't want to begin to study the matter. I would like to obtain simple answers. For example: is there a solid reason to have a 300 v tube pre from a listener or player point of view? If the answer is yes, those reasons apply only if the pre is pushed or even if it is used clean? If not, there are examples of starved plate designs in so called all tube monsters, like the SVT, orange AD 200 etc.? Thanks for your attention



    Respectfully, I feel like the whole starved plate thing is/was an unquantifiable tangent, there's a broad range of valid operating voltages for typical tubes, same as with most analog electronic components. And even so many (most?) bass/guitar amps are derived from the same circuits and run the tubes at what I would consider pretty normal voltages (as Passinwind has already alluded to, there are standard techniques to calculate the operating point of the tube, and there is no "full voltage" mode of operation).

    In battery powered pedals (and possibly a few amps, but I'm not aware of any) things get a little less clear - folks sometimes run tubes at abnormally low voltages, and IMHO this is mostly a marketing strategy (folks see a glowing tube and are prepared to pay more), but I'm sure there are a few examples of properly designed circuits deliberately using tubes outside of their normal operating range, it's just not a common thing, and none of the classic amps circuits I'm aware of do it.

  10. Regarding high voltage and that tube driven mosfets in the WA back end, this is what the
    Mesa engineer "agedhorse" answered when I asked those features in a contemporary thread on Talkbass:


    "The B+ supply is somewhere around 300V. Power supply voltage is only a small factor as it is entirely possible to design a preamp operating at a lower voltage that sounds virtually identical. There are many other, more important factors involved.

    The second tube provides the direct gate drive of the mosfets. It's a combination PI/driver with voltage and current gain. It's a unique application of MOSFET technology."



    That is interesting, in that the schematic shows the tube in the preamp is basically just a standard Fender style preamp stage, with some fixed resistors for the tone controls (EQ is then handled via an op-amp based stage after the preamp), and it seems to indicate they voiced the driver stage a particular way.

    So although "unique" is arguably questionable related to any aspect of amp design, it may well be this is an important and characteristic part of the amp topology, and it is a little different from the more typical approach of a Fender style tube preamp feeding an all solid state power-amp stage.

  11. The walkabout has a 12ax7 in the gain stage and another one destined to drive the mosfets. Please do not expect I can give you detailed engineering data or explanations, but according to the Mesa people and the knowkedge available on other boards about the WA (mega thread on talkbass), it seems that the m-pulse technology was conceived this way to fill the behavioral gap between full tube and hybrid. I can testify they built something special with that proprietary circuit.



    There are schematics available on the internet, nothing that special in there, it's a hybrid of tubes and cheap op amps in the preamp with a pretty standard solid state power amp.

    Not saying it's not a nice amp (I've played one and enjoyed it) but there's no proprietary magic in there imo, it's just one of the better (albeit overpriced in the UK) traditional hybrid amps.
  12. Like with a car, the cost depends on why are you getting a service and what needs to be done.

    Unlike a car, solid state amps at least have very few serviceable components, so I'd ensure you actually need work doing before handing over cash.

  13. [quote name='stevie' timestamp='1490950284' post='3269264']
    I'll give it a go. I've just tried three other highly recommended drawing programs, but they're not as intuitive to use as Paint. I just need a copy-and-past feature so that I don't have to draw everything from scratch, and the ability to save text as text, so that I can edit rather than erasing and re-writing.
    [/quote]

    For simple diagrams I use Google draw: https://docs.google.com/drawings/

    It doesn't have schematic symbols, but it works well for basic layout diagrams.

  14. I think this is pretty common, for example markbass sell the blackline 250 which is basically the same as a little mark 3 but the latter is twice the price for a different power amp and a yellow box.

    I'm not sure it's really justified by production costs, but entry level gear has to be cheap or it won't sell, and the more powerful models are generally what you need if you gig regularly so what do you do?

  15. The diagrams do look much clearer, thanks!

    One very minor observation - in the LF schematic there's only R1 shown not the parallel R1/R2 shown in the layout and parts list.

    I've been having a play spice modelling these in an effort to understand the frequency/phase response better (I'm a novice when it comes to crossover design but once studied the basic principles, many years ago!)

    Currently not quite sure the best way to model the electrical characteristics of the drivers (I assume an inductor/resistor but I'm unfamiliar with exactly how to approach specifying this). Modelling the LCR networks is simple enough though so I've started with that.

    Happy to share the results for discussion here if such reverse-engineering & analysis is OK by stevie :)

×
×
  • Create New...